Adenosine receptors interacting proteins (ARIPs): Behind the biology of adenosine signaling

Adenosine is a well known neuromodulator in the central nervous system. As a consequence, adenosine can be beneficial in certain disorders and adenosine receptors will be potential targets for therapy in a variety of diseases. Adenosine receptors are G protein-coupled receptors, and are also expressed in a large variety of cells and tissues. Using these receptors as a paradigm of G protein-coupled receptors, the present review focus on how protein-protein interactions might contribute to neurotransmitter/neuromodulator regulation, based on the fact that accessory proteins impinge on the receptor/G protein interaction and therefore modulate receptor functioning. Besides affecting receptor signaling, these accessory components also play a key role in receptor trafficking, internalization and desensitization, as it will be reviewed here. In conclusion, the finding of an increasing number of adenosine receptors interacting proteins, and specially the molecular and functional integration of these accessory proteins into receptorsomes, will open new perspectives in the understanding of particular disorders where these receptors have been proved to be involved.     

Cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans are involved in the binding of Hsp90α and Hsp90β to the cell plasma membrane

Extracellular membrane-bound and secreted heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) is known to be involved in cell motility and invasion. The mechanism of Hsp90 anchoring to the plasma membrane remains obscure. We showed that treatment of human glioblastoma A-172 and fibrosarcoma HT1080 cells with sodium chlorate, heparinase, and heparin causes a prominent loss of 2 Hsp90 cytosolic isoforms, Hsp90α and Hsp90β, from the cell surface and strongly inhibits the binding of exogenous Hsp90 to cells. We revealed that Hsp90α and Hsp90β are partly colocalized with heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) on the cell surface and that this colocalization was sensitive to heparin. The results demonstrate that cell surface HSPGs are involved in the binding/anchoring of Hsp90α and Hsp90β to the plasma membrane.     

D‐AKAP2:PKA RII:PDZK1 ternary complex structure: Insights from the nucleation of a polyvalent scaffold

A‐kinase anchoring proteins (AKAPs) regulate cAMP‐dependent protein kinase (PKA) signaling in space and time. Dual‐specific AKAP2 (D‐AKAP2/AKAP10) binds with high affinity to both RI and RII regulatory subunits of PKA and is anchored to transporters through PDZ domain proteins. Here, we describe a structure of D‐AKAP2 in complex with two interacting partners and the exact mechanism by which a segment that on its own is disordered presents an α‐helix to PKA and a β‐strand to PDZK1. These two motifs nucleate a polyvalent scaffold and show how PKA signaling is linked to the regulation of transporters. Formation of the D‐AKAP2: PKA binary complex is an important first step for high affinity interaction with PDZK1, and the structure reveals important clues toward understanding this phenomenon. In contrast to many other AKAPs, D‐AKAP2 does not interact directly with the membrane protein. Instead, the interaction is facilitated by the C‐terminus of D‐AKAP2, which contains two binding motifs—the D‐AKAP2_AKB and the PDZ motif—that are joined by a short linker and only become ordered upon binding to their respective partner signaling proteins. The D‐AKAP2_AKB binds to the D/D domain of the R‐subunit and the C‐terminal PDZ motif binds to a PDZ domain (from PDZK1) that serves as a bridging protein to the transporter. This structure also provides insights into the fundamental question of why D‐AKAP2 would exhibit a differential mode of binding to the two PKA isoforms.     

Role of AKAP 149–PKA–PDE4A complex in cell survival and cell differentiation processes

The cellular localization of A-kinase anchoring proteins (AKAPs), protein kinase A (PKAs) and phosphodiesterases (PDEs) is a key step to the spatiotemporal regulation of the second messenger adenosine 3′,5′-cyclic monophosphate (cAMP). In this paper the cellular distribution of the mitochondrial AKAP 149–PKA–PDE4A complex and its implications in the cell death induced by YTX treatment, a known PDE modulator, was studied. K-562 cell line was incubated with YTX for 24 or 48 h. Under these conditions AKAP 149, PKA and type-4A PDE (PDE4A) levels were measured in the cytosol, in the plasma membrane and in the nucleus. Apoptotic hallmarks were also measured after the same conditions. In addition, YTX effect on cell viability was checked after AKAP 149 and PDE4A silencing. The results obtained show a decrease in AKAP 149–PKA–PDE4A levels in cytosol after YTX exposure. 24 h after the toxin addition, the complex expression increased in the plasma membrane and after 48 h in the nucleus domain. Furthermore Bcl-2 levels were decreased and the expression of caspase 3 together with caspase 8 activity were increased after 24 h of toxin incubation but not after 48 h. These results suggest apoptotic cell death at 24 h and a non-apoptotic cell death after 48 h. When AKAP 149 and PDE4A were silenced YTX did not induce cellular death. In summary, AKAP 149–PKA–PDE4A complex localization is related with YTX effect in K-562 cell line. When this complex is mainly located in the plasma membrane apoptosis is activated while when the complex is in the nuclear domain non-apoptotic cellular death or cellular differentiation is activated. Therefore AKAP 149–PKA–PDE4A distribution and integrity have a key role in cellular survival.     

Vegetation Succession and its Consequences for Slope Stability in SE Spain

The effect of land abandonment as a result of changing land-use policies is becoming more and more important throughout Europe. In this case study, the role of vegetation succession and landslide activity on steep abandoned slopes was investigated. The influence of vegetation succession on soil properties over time, as well as how developing root systems affect soil reinforcement was determined. The study was carried out in the Alcoy basin in SE Spain, where the marl substratum is prone to landsliding along steep ravines. The bench-terraced slopes have been abandoned progressively over the last 50 years and show various stages of revegetation. The study was carried out at two scales; at the catchment scale long-term evolution of land-use, vegetation succession and slope failure processes were investigated. At a more detailed scale, vegetation cover, soil properties and rooting effects on soil strength were determined. Results showed that the soil has changed over a period of 50 years with respect to soil properties, vegetation cover and rooting, which is reflected in the activity of geomorphological processes. Vegetation succession progressively limits surface processes (sheet wash and concentrated overland flow) over time, whereas slopes affected by mass wasting processes increase in number. The spatial heterogeneity of infiltration increases over time, leading to increased macro-pore flow towards the regolith zone, enhancing the potential risk of fast wetting of the regolith directly above the potential plane of failure, as was concluded from rainfall simulations. In situ experiments to determine soil shear strength in relation to rooting indicated that roots contributed to soil strength, but only in the upper 0.4 m of the soil. Most failures however, occur at greater depths (1.0–1.2 m) as anchorage by deeper roots was not effective or absent. The observed initial increase in mass wasting processes after land abandonment can therefore be explained in two ways: (1) the limited contribution of anchorage by root systems at potential slip planes which cannot counterbalance the initial decline of the terrace walls, and (2) the fast transfer of rainfall to the potential slip plane by macro-pores enhancing mass movements. However, after approximately 40 years of abandonment, mass wasting processes decline.     

An intracellular trafficking pathway in the seminiferous epithelium regulating spermatogenesis: a biochemical and molecular perspective

During spermatogenesis in adult rat testes, fully developed spermatids (i.e. spermatozoa) at the luminal edge of the seminiferous epithelium undergo “spermiation” at stage VIII of the seminiferous epithelial cycle. This is manifested by the disruption of the apical ectoplasmic specialization (apical ES) so that spermatozoa can enter the tubule lumen and to complete their maturation in the epididymis. At the same time, the blood–testis barrier (BTB) located near the basement membrane undergoes extensive restructuring to allow transit of preleptotene spermatocytes so that post-meiotic germ cells complete their development behind the BTB. While spermiation and BTB restructuring take place concurrently at opposite ends of the Sertoli cell epithelium, the biochemical mechanism(s) by which they are coordinated were not known until recently. Studies have shown that fragments of laminin chains are generated from the laminin/integrin protein complex at the apical ES via the action of MMP-2 (matrix metalloprotease-2) at spermiation. These peptides serve as the local autocrine factors to destabilize the BTB. These laminin peptides also exert their effects on hemidesmosome which, in turn, further potentiates BTB restructuring. Thus, a novel apical ES-BTB-hemidesmosome regulatory loop is operating in the seminiferous epithelium to coordinate these two crucial cellular events of spermatogenesis. This functional loop is further assisted by the Par3/Par6-based polarity protein complex in coordination with cytokines and testosterone at the BTB. Herein, we provide a critical review based on the latest findings in the field regarding the regulation of these cellular events. These recent findings also open up a new window for investigators studying blood–tissue barriers.     

Perineurial Barrier Glia Physically Respond to Alcohol in an Akap200-Dependent Manner to Promote Tolerance

1. Download high-res image (266KB)
2. Download full-size image

     

GISP: a novel brain-specific protein that promotes surface expression and function of GABA(B) receptors

Synaptic transmission depends on the regulated surface expression of neurotransmitter receptors, but many of the cellular processes required to achieve this remain poorly understood. To better define specific mechanisms for the GABA(B) receptor (GABA(B)R) trafficking, we screened for proteins that bind to the carboxy-terminus of the GABA(B1) subunit. We report the identification and characterization of a novel 130-kDa protein, GPCR interacting scaffolding protein (GISP), that interacts directly with the GABA(B1) subunit via a coiled-coil domain. GISP co-fractionates with GABA(B)R and with the postsynaptic density and co-immunoprecipitates with GABA(B1) and GABA(B2) from rat brain. In cultured hippocampal neurons, GISP displays a punctate dendritic distribution and has an overlapping localization with GABA(B)Rs. When co-expressed with GABA(B)Rs in human embryonic kidney cells, GISP promotes GABA(B)R surface expression and enhances both baclofen-evoked extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) phosphorylation and G-protein inwardly rectifying potassium channel (GIRK) currents. These results suggest that GISP is involved in the forward trafficking and stabilization of functional GABA(B)Rs.     

Cell shape regulation by Gravin requires N-terminal membrane effector domains

Gravin (AKAP12, SSeCKS) is a scaffolding protein that acts as a potent inhibitor of tumor metastasis in vivo and in vitro, and regulates morphogenesis during vertebrate gastrulation. Despite being implicated in many cellular processes, surprisingly little is known about the mechanism by which Gravin elicits cell shape changes. In this work, we use in vitro cell spreading assays to demonstrate that the Gravin N-terminus containing the three MARCKS-like basic regions (BRs) is necessary and sufficient to regulate cell shape in vitro. We show that the conserved phosphorylation sites in the BRs are essential for their function in these assays. We further demonstrate that the Gravin BRs are necessary for in vivo function during gastrulation in zebrafish. Together, these results provide an important step forward in understanding the mechanism of Gravin function in cell shape regulation and provide valuable insight into how Gravin acts as a cytoskeletal regulator.     

GISP binding to TSG101 increases GABA receptor stability by down-regulating ESCRT-mediated lysosomal degradation

The neuron-specific G protein-coupled receptor interacting scaffold protein (GISP) is a multidomain, brain-specific protein derived from the A-kinase anchoring protein-9 gene. We originally isolated GISP as an interacting partner for the GABA(B) receptor subunit GABA(B1). Here, we show that the protein tumour susceptibility gene 101 (TSG101), an integral component of the endosomal sorting machinery that targets membrane proteins for lysosomal degradation, also interacts with GISP. TSG101 co-immunoprecipitates with GISP from adult rat brain, and using GST pull-downs, we identified that the eighth coiled-coiled region of GISP is critical for TSG101 association. Intriguingly, although there is no direct interaction between GISP and the GABA(B2) subunit, their co-expression in HEK293 cells increases levels of GABA(B2). GISP also inhibits TSG101-dependent GABA(B2) down-regulation in human embryonic kidney 293 cells whereas over-expression of a mutant GISP lacking the TSG101 binding domain has no effect on GABA(B2) degradation. These data suggest that GISP can function as a negative regulator of TSG101-dependent lysosomal degradation of transmembrane proteins in neurons to promote receptor stability.